"The judicial role is rarely more essential than in the context of the Great Writ," counsel for Maryland federal judges wrote ...

Stephen Miller said courts can’t rule on Trump’s immigration actions. Experts say he’s wrong Maria Ramirez Uribe Fri, May 16, 2025 at 4:03 PM UTC 8 min read ...

A group of immigrants and civil rights groups is suing the Trump administration in an effort to halt arrests at United States ...

Although applauded by many, the actions of these judges are inconsistent with the proper use of the judicial power and with the rule of law itself.

The time for action doesn't have to wait until 2025. The Trump team can begin sending clear signals now: the era of accepting judicial gridlock is ending.

The Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that federal courts do not have the authority to review certain discretionary decisions made by immigration agencies, marking a significant shift in judicial ...

Immigration Enforcement Actions and Compliance – Best Practices for Employers Isabelle Bibet-Kalinyak, Ryan O'Donnell, Zachary Schurin Pullman & Comley - Labor, Employment and Employee Benefits Law ...

It’s true that the immigration courts face an unprecedented backlog of more than 650,000 pending cases. But it’s not for the reasons asserted by Sessions.

“ [An immigration judge’s] words, actions, attitudes and even body language send powerful messages, positive or negative, about our court system and our national values,” he said.