MSNBC contributor discusses why the Epstein list won’t change the investigation’s outcome or public perception.

White House aides have made it clear that no one in the administration is allowed to talk about Epstein without high-level vetting as Trump attempts to change the subject.

The Department of Justice and FBI's memo on the federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein has reignited criticism from some of President Donald Trump's supporters over information released in the case involving one of the most infamous sex trafficking criminals in modern history.

Donald Trump long accused opponents of hiding a list of Epstein clients. Now Pam Bondi says the list doesn't exist. What was Epstein convicted of?

Plus, meet the people trying to decipher why hail is becoming a bigger problem, and Scottie Scheffler inches closer to a career Grand Slam.

When the Trump administration, not known for understatement, finally engaged with the Jeffrey Epstein controversy, it did so with an understatement of the ages, seeking court approval for the release of grand-jury transcripts because it qualified “as a matter of public interest.”

Lawmakers from the left are putting pressure on what has become a sensitive spot for Trump with his growingly frustrated base.

Epstein was a monstrous and grotesque sexual predator. Along with his convicted confederate, Ghislaine Maxwell, he systematically groomed and sexually abused (and enabled the sexual abuse of) hundreds and hundreds of young women and girls.

Trump's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case tests the loyalty of his MAGA supporters, who demand transparency about government corruption rather than dismissive comments

ANALYSIS: The president and the Duke of York share a love of golf ... and the notorious sex-trafficking financier as a former friend, writes