The dissent, authored by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, suggests that the legal theory of five-vote majority decision was largely of the Court’s own making and contends that its narrow interpretation of ...
A dispute over floating turds has led to liberal San Francisco enabling Trump's Supreme Court to hamstring the EPA. How did ...
Northwestern Pritzker School of Law’s Robert Weinstock and Alexa Longstaff say there are shortcomings to the Supreme Court ...
Opinion
1dOpinion
The New Republic on MSNAmy Coney Barrett Isn’t What the Conservative Legal Movement ExpectedIt takes a few years for new justices to get accustomed to serving on the Supreme Court. Like any new hire to any workplace, the high court’s most junior members tend to take it slow at first. New ...
Justice Amy Coney Barrett said the Supreme Court reached a "puzzling" conclusion in a case on water regulations issued by the EPA.
The Supreme Court of the United States ruled on March 4 that it had sided with the city of San Francisco and against the U.S.
On Tuesday, March 4, the United States Supreme Court issued a major decision limiting the scope of the Environmental Protection Agency’s ...
Conservatives on the Supreme Court have again rescued the nation from out-of-control bureaucrats inflicting prohibitive costs ...
Conservative allies of President Donald Trump called Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett “evil,” a “closet Democrat” and a “DEI hire.” ...
With its opinion in San Francisco v. EPA, the U.S. Supreme Court has again acted to "right" the implementation of the federal Clean Water Act ...
In a 5-4 ruling on March 4, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) lacks authority to impose Clean Water Act ...
In 5-4 ruling, with Justice Amy Coney Barrett joining liberal wing in dissent, the high court says EPA has the responsibility ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results