Justices Thomas and Alito dissented from the court’s refusal to reconsider a 25-year-old precedent upholding “buffer zones” ...
The Associated Press on MSN10d
Supreme Court turns back challenges to laws keeping abortion opponents away from clinics, patientsSamuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, disagreed. The cities said the laws were passed to address disturbing behavior from ...
Abortion opponents wanted the Supreme Court to scrap protest restrictions around clinics. Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito said they would have taken the case.
For nearly three years, it has seemed inevitable that the Supreme Court would strike down the “buffer zones” that restrict ...
Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented, saying that the precedent deserved a fresh look since the court ...
“Hill was wrong the day it was decided, and the case for overruling it has only strengthened ever since,” Paul Clement, a ...
N.J., that ban anti-abortion activists from approaching someone entering an abortion clinic, sometimes dubbed “sidewalk ...
Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, disagreed. The cities said the laws were passed to address disturbing behavior from protesters outside of health care clinics. But anti-abortion activists said ...
The Supreme Court refused Monday to take up a First Amendment case to revisit a previous ruling enshrining abortion clinic ...
Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito said they would have taken the cases. Anti-abortion groups, as well as a number of Republican attorneys general, wanted the justices to use the challenges ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results