An environmental lawyer who wrote an amicus brief in San Francisco v. EPA believes a criticized ruling actually means tougher ...
The New Republic on MSN4dOpinion
The Supreme Court Muddied the Clean Water Act Yet AgainAmy Coney Barrett joined the liberal justices in a dissent against Samuel Alito—and his thinly veiled policy agenda.
The U.S. Supreme Court sided with San Francisco on Tuesday in a ruling that narrows the Clean Water Act. The case pitted a ...
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court substantially weakened federal limitations on raw sewage discharge into nearby bodies of water.
Supporters of SB 601 say the bill is a response to a 2023 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court and to a second Trump ...
San Francisco argued that Clean Water Act permits should function like recipes that restrict specific ingredients in a dish, ...
In a narrow 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled to limit the EPA's authority to issue broad water pollution permits under ...
Americans are getting antsy about the possibility of poop in the drinking water thanks to a new interpretation of the Clean ...
The justices ruled that the agency cannot impose generic prohibitions against violating water quality standards.
The 5-to-4 decision is the latest setback for the agency and could have sweeping implications for curtailing water pollution ...
On Tuesday, March 4, 2025, the Supreme Court issued an opinion in City and County of San Francisco, California v.
The Supreme Court dealt another blow to federal environmental protections on Tuesday in a major water pollution case. In a 5–4 ruling in City and County of San Francisco v. EPA, the justices ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback